Predicting Trump’s trajectory is hard, because the territory
is uncharted. A rogue rocket has launched from Cape Canaveral with a nuclear
warhead on board and we’re hoping that when it crashes and burns, it doesn’t take
out downtown Orlando.
All the famous checks and balances built into the American
political system? The ones designed to stop tyranny and to act as a firewall
against the agenda of a power-hungry megalomaniac? They will be tested to the
full by Donald J Trump, believe me.
Part of the problem is that no one – from the founding
fathers onwards – could ever have predicted anyone quite like this man claiming
power. The political establishment and the constitutional experts might have
imagined a calculating crook or an ideological extremist assuming the
presidency. But the pussy-grabbing, China-baiting, tweet-firing freakshow that
is Trump? He’s just not in the instruction manual.
It’s beyond question that it will all end in tears. The only issue is whose tears? If the lacrimal flood is limited to Donald
himself, we can all breathe a huge sigh of relief. But let’s not kid ourselves.
This guy will cause a lot of collateral damage along the way.
My prediction, for what it’s worth, is that foreign policy
and security will be Trump’s ultimate undoing.
It seems inevitable there will be moves to impeach him at
some point, but the wheels grind slowly and the GOP will be largely supportive
in what might laughably be described as Trump’s honeymoon. The President’s
domestic policy will be offensive and retrograde, but in many respects this is
where he is most in line with the agenda of House and Senate Republicans. They
all love nothing better than taking away hard-earned workers’ rights, attacking
women and restricting access to healthcare.
Trump is on much more problematic ground with his erratic
personal behaviour on social media and his tendency to make foreign policy on
the hoof. I foresee a crisis with a foreign power precipitated by his
trigger-happy Twitter account or some inane (or perhaps insane) announcement he
makes off the cuff in a press conference.
The Chinese leadership will be watching closely. The issue
of Taiwan and their so-called ‘One China’ policy is a red line. So is their
sphere of influence in the ocean territories disputed with Japan, South Korea
and The Philippines.
The issue of Russia and kompromat
and the lovefest with Vladimir Putin is not going to go away. There’s only one
thing worse than seeing someone fall head over heels with the wrong guy. And
that’s dealing with the aftermath when their relationship implodes.
While many of us are sickened by the closeness of the
lovebirds right now, things could easily be turned on their head overnight.
Why? Because Trump doesn’t have one inch of loyalty to anyone except himself. What
he says on Tuesday, he happily contradicts on Friday. And by Monday, he’s
forgotten he ever said it.
There is a lot of commentary about the fact that Trump seems
hostile to the intelligence community and doesn’t like to be briefed. My hunch
is that the spooks won’t share anything of substance with him anyway, even if
he does start granting them an audience.
As the guy doesn’t read anything, I would just dress up some
reports from the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times and tell him that
it’s a briefing. Would he know any different? It would be a risky strategy, for
sure, as ideally you’d want the President to be on top of world events. But
this is not a normal situation and it would surely be even more risky to share
detailed classified intelligence.
Former US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld referred to ‘known
knowns’ – things we know we know. Then there were ‘known unknowns’ – the things
we know we don’t know. But there was
also his third, and rather scary, category of knowledge called the ‘unknown
unknowns’. These are the things we don’t
know we don’t know.
In every presidency, stuff will turn up that we can’t imagine
yet. ‘Events’, as British Prime Minister
Harold Macmillan quaintly described them. How will Trump react? Will there be
one 3am tweet too many?
In the UK, the ‘men in grey suits’ come to tell a Prime
Minister it’s time to go. There’s not really any provision for the men in white
coats.
The 25th Amendment of the US Constitution does,
however, allow for a President to be declared unfit for office by the Vice-President
and senior cabinet members. Star Trek aficionados will recognise this as the
right of the Chief Medical Officer on board a Starfleet vessel to declare the
Captain incapacitated.
Comments
Post a Comment