Skip to main content

Neither Labour nor the Tories are fit to govern. So where does that leave democracy?

What happens exactly when a divided and dysfunctional government goes head to head with a divided and dysfunctional opposition? 

It’s not a question we’ve really ever had to confront in modern British political history. 

The last time a government was as discredited and shambolic as the Tories are today, it was in the early 1990s. John Major was battling a bunch of Eurosceptics he colourfully chose to describe as ‘bastards’ (one of whom, incidentally, was a former army lieutenant and all-round pain-in-the-rear-end called Iain Duncan Smith). The UK crashed out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism and John Major pottered aimlessly for a few years initiating groundbreaking policy initiatives such as the Cones Hotline.

By this time, Neil Kinnock was gone. He had been replaced by the competent John Smith, who in turn was replaced by the irrepressible Tony Blair. Major’s card had been marked. With every passing month Labour looked more and more like a government in waiting.

Rewind another ten years and it was the Labour Party which had been bitterly divided and riddled with in-fighting.  The Bennite wing had tried to seize control and had cultivated a power base in local government, best exemplified by councils such as Lambeth, Brent and the GLC.  Trotskyist infiltration was rife and the Militant Tendency had effective control of Liverpool City Council.
By comparison, the Tories looked frighteningly competent and ruthless at this point. After the Falklands War and her landslide victory in the 1983 election, Margaret Thatcher was in her prime. She had purged a number of the Tory ‘wets’ and was pursuing her ideological agenda by taking on the miners and, subsequently, the News International printers at Wapping.  

There was one moment of Conservative weakness and infighting – the Westland helicopter saga – which pitted Thatcher against her Europhile nemesis Michael Heseltine.  Neil Kinnock was unable, however, to turn the government’s discomfort to Labour’s advantage.

In 2016, a fractured government is confronted by a fractious opposition.  The public looks at Cameron, Osborne, IDS and the motley crew of Tories they elected just last year and wonders what the hell is going on.  Under normal circumstances, the party’s division over the EU referendum and the Budget would spell misery at the polls in May. But the public looks at Labour and its leader and knows that it is no credible replacement for the Conservatives. It doesn’t even look that worthy a recipient of a protest vote, to be honest.

So where does this leave us? It’s like Novak Djokovic playing left-handed with an eye patch against Andy Murray, while the dour Scotsman ties his legs together with a sweat band. 

The crazy thing is that we could easily see complete political turmoil in the months ahead.

What if the UK votes to leave the European Union and Cameron is utterly ruined?  This could be followed by months of further Tory in-fighting, as well as threats from Scotland to withdraw from the UK in a second referendum. Tumultuous events, which could easily create a scenario for another general election – even within the confines of the rules for our fixed-term parliaments.

One thing is certain. The British people deserve so much better than the choice on offer right now.  Incompetent right-wing ideologues on one side, tearing themselves apart on Europe.  Dogmatic old-style socialists on the other, in complete denial about how out of touch they are with public sentiment.

Matter meets anti-matter. And the net result will be a scary democratic void.


  1. "By this time, Neil Kinnock was gone. He had been replaced by the competent John Smith, who in turn was replaced by the irrepressible Tony Blair".

    Jeez, what is the opposite of the love that dare not speak its name.John Smith "competent" and Tony Blair "irrepressible", couldn't take the post seriously after that.

    1. I'm just delighted you took the post seriously up until that point, James!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I was sad when I quit Labour a year ago. Now, I feel a sense of relief.

What motivates decent people to stay as members of the Labour Party?
It’s a question I’ve been pondering intensely over the past year, which I’ve spent in self-imposed exile. I resigned the moment Jeremy Corbyn was re-elected as leader after the contest with Owen Smith.
When I quit, it was with a very heavy heart.
As far back as the late 1980s, I’d served as Labour General Secretary of the London NUS. By the early 90s, I was chairing Frank Dobson’s constituency party in inner London. On two occasions, I stood as a Labour parliamentary candidate.
If you make that kind of commitment, you assume it’s a relationship that will last for life. And even though I hadn’t been an activist in recent years, it never occurred to me that I’d be forced to rip up my party card. 
Today, as Labour’s 2017 conference looms, I wonder how anyone with a moderate viewpoint can kid themselves the party is even worth rescuing.
One group of centre-ground survivors falls into the category of the bloody minded. Like …

What if the whole Corbyn project is based on a lie?

If there’s one thing that scares the Corbyn movement more than anything else, it’s the emergence of a new centre-ground party.
Supporters know very well that once it arrives, the alleged ‘popularity’ of Labour’s far-left leadership would be badly exposed – in just the same way that Michael Foot’s good poll ratings disintegrated with the emergence of the SDP in the early 1980s.
When people are given a choice, many will opt for moderation.
When they lack choice – a particularly stark problem in the UK’s indefensible first-past-the-post electoral system – they tend to polarise to left and right.
For supporters of today’s Labour leadership, it’s therefore critically important to dismiss the centre ground as something which no one wants any more. As a failed ‘neo-liberal’ project, which has no relevance to 2018.
But consider the facts.
A recent BMG Research poll for The Independent found that millions of voters currently find themselves without a political home.
Many feel that the main parties …

Cult of personality? The writing's on the wall.

Nothing makes Corbynistas more angry than the suggestion there are cult-like qualities to their movement and their veneration of the man they affectionately label ‘JC’. This accusation is viewed as such a slur, in fact, that on some social media channels moderated by the far left, anyone using the term ‘cult’ is deemed to be abusive and is in danger of finding themselves banned.
The evidence – specifically a cult of personality - is, however, now so strong as to be incontrovertible.
The madness reached some kind of apogee this week with the unveiling of a mural of Corbyn on his home turf of Islington.  
Let’s be clear. Murals celebrating political figures are not a part of British culture, unless of course you count the streets of West Belfast, where the Labour Leader has built up a strong network of contacts over the years. I’m sure they are de rigueur in parts of Gaza City, where the veteran socialist MP counts yet more friends.
It’s difficult to establish who is the more idiotic.…