Skip to main content

This is a confrontation that can't be avoided. But the long-term future looks bleak.

So the battle has been joined. The revolt by Labour MPs – denounced as a ‘chicken coup’ by Corbyn supporters online – turns out to be serious. After the Party made a disastrous decision to elect the Islington leftist last summer, the chickens have actually come home to roost.

As Angela Eagle prepares to launch her challenge at a smart central London venue on Monday morning, there are two important questions to be answered.

The first is whether Owen Smith will stake his own claim to be the challenger. The MP for Pontypridd is viewed as much more sympathetic to the embattled socialist incumbent and only resigned very reluctantly from the shadow cabinet. He has been vocally supportive of the ill-fated ‘peace deal’ proposed by Deputy Leader Tom Watson and some representatives of the trade unions.

If Smith has any remaining ambitions, it needs to be made clear to him very firmly that there can be only one challenger. Angela Eagle presents much more of a serious ideological counterpoint to Corbyn, which is important. This election is only worth winning if it sets Labour back on the road towards electability. Smith’s pronouncements give me no confidence in that regard.

The second question is whether Corbyn even makes it on to the ballot paper. Conflicting legal advice on this question might lead to a High Court judge making the ultimate decision.

While Neil Kinnock maintains the precedent is for the incumbent leader to obtain nominations in the same way as challengers, others worry that a ballot paper without Jez’s name might not go down too well with his vehement and increasingly belligerent supporters. It may be that the PLP wants to avoid accusations of some kind of fix.

It is hard to see Angela Eagle winning, although on this occasion, I would tend to agree with the Corbynistas that the winning of elections isn’t the most important thing, as long as we stand up for what is right. Some people speculate that Angela might be a stalking horse, but the really credible candidates – David Miliband, Sadiq Khan, Chuka Umunna and Alan Johnson – are all unavailable or probably have too much sense to get involved.

This may well turn out to be a final and pivotal contest for the very soul of a party which has existed since 1900. It is a party which was founded to achieve progress for working people and has huge achievements to its name. We only have to scratch the surface to find momentous changes forged by Labour, which have shaped the lives of everyone in the UK.

The National Health Service. The modern welfare state. Comprehensive education. The Open University. The first legislation against racial and sexual discrimination. The national minimum wage.  Devolution of power to Scotland, Wales and London. Freedom of information.

In the space of just under a year, this proud party with its incredible track record, has been brought to its knees. Why? Because its membership – wholly unrepresentative of Labour voters, let alone the Tory and UKIP voters Labour needs to win back – deliberately opted for political oblivion and irrelevance.

The members were warned a thousand times that Corbyn’s 80s-style metropolitan socialism could never have a wide appeal in 2016. They saw the evidence of the veteran left-winger’s poor communication skills and lack of natural leadership ability. But, swelled by large numbers of three-pound fly-by-nights, they set in train a series of events which has been truly catastrophic.

We are at a crossroads right now. Either Corbyn is defeated and his faction breaks away, leaving the Labour name and brand in the hands of moderates. Or Eagle loses in a valiant last stand and the mainstream Labour contingent forms its own new party.

The prognosis isn’t good for British politics either way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I was sad when I quit Labour a year ago. Now, I feel a sense of relief.

What motivates decent people to stay as members of the Labour Party?
It’s a question I’ve been pondering intensely over the past year, which I’ve spent in self-imposed exile. I resigned the moment Jeremy Corbyn was re-elected as leader after the contest with Owen Smith.
When I quit, it was with a very heavy heart.
As far back as the late 1980s, I’d served as Labour General Secretary of the London NUS. By the early 90s, I was chairing Frank Dobson’s constituency party in inner London. On two occasions, I stood as a Labour parliamentary candidate.
If you make that kind of commitment, you assume it’s a relationship that will last for life. And even though I hadn’t been an activist in recent years, it never occurred to me that I’d be forced to rip up my party card. 
Today, as Labour’s 2017 conference looms, I wonder how anyone with a moderate viewpoint can kid themselves the party is even worth rescuing.
One group of centre-ground survivors falls into the category of the bloody minded. Like …

What if the whole Corbyn project is based on a lie?

If there’s one thing that scares the Corbyn movement more than anything else, it’s the emergence of a new centre-ground party.
Supporters know very well that once it arrives, the alleged ‘popularity’ of Labour’s far-left leadership would be badly exposed – in just the same way that Michael Foot’s good poll ratings disintegrated with the emergence of the SDP in the early 1980s.
When people are given a choice, many will opt for moderation.
When they lack choice – a particularly stark problem in the UK’s indefensible first-past-the-post electoral system – they tend to polarise to left and right.
For supporters of today’s Labour leadership, it’s therefore critically important to dismiss the centre ground as something which no one wants any more. As a failed ‘neo-liberal’ project, which has no relevance to 2018.
But consider the facts.
A recent BMG Research poll for The Independent found that millions of voters currently find themselves without a political home.
Many feel that the main parties …

Cult of personality? The writing's on the wall.

Nothing makes Corbynistas more angry than the suggestion there are cult-like qualities to their movement and their veneration of the man they affectionately label ‘JC’. This accusation is viewed as such a slur, in fact, that on some social media channels moderated by the far left, anyone using the term ‘cult’ is deemed to be abusive and is in danger of finding themselves banned.
The evidence – specifically a cult of personality - is, however, now so strong as to be incontrovertible.
The madness reached some kind of apogee this week with the unveiling of a mural of Corbyn on his home turf of Islington.  
Let’s be clear. Murals celebrating political figures are not a part of British culture, unless of course you count the streets of West Belfast, where the Labour Leader has built up a strong network of contacts over the years. I’m sure they are de rigueur in parts of Gaza City, where the veteran socialist MP counts yet more friends.
It’s difficult to establish who is the more idiotic.…