Skip to main content

Why it's crunch time on both sides of the Atlantic

2018 is set to be a year of political reckoning in both the UK and the USA. It’s very easy to imagine the crises that are likely to unfold, but much harder to predict their consequences or the way in which they will be resolved.

Trump will clearly come under increasing pressure as a result of the investigation into Russian collusion by former FBI Director Robert Mueller. If there is to be any realistic prospect of the current President being removed through an impeachment process, we’ll need to see some spark of activity in 2018. Otherwise we’ll be moving inexorably towards the next primary cycle and attention will turn to the removal of Donald Trump in the traditional, tried-and-tested way – at the ballot box.

The mid-term elections in November might prove to be decisive in terms of forcing the hand of Republican Senators and Congressmen. After all, if polling evidence is to be believed, the Democrats look set to make significant gains with Trump’s popularity at a record low. The realisation may dawn that propping up the White House incumbent threatens the very existence of the GOP.

But plenty can happen before we reach those critical elections.

My feeling has always been that Trump will ultimately be brought down because of an international crisis rather than a domestic one. As he comes under increasing pressure and scrutiny, he really only has two places to turn. He can mobilise his vocal base to rally and protest in the states where he’s still popular. And he can aim for the distraction of military intervention abroad.

As we head into 2018, the message from the White House is that China is flouting the latest sanctions on oil sales to North Korea, providing Pyongyang with an illicit lifeline in defiance of the United Nations. How long before Trump decides that a confrontation with the man he dubs ‘Little Rocket Man’ would be the perfect way to deflect from the scandal engulfing his administration?

A pre-emptive strike on Kim Jong Un’s nuclear facilities would be absolutely reckless, but there are many American commentators far more clued-up than Trump, who fear that North Korea’s missile and nuclear capability is about to reach a critical tipping point. Kim is profoundly irrational and provocative, which provides cover for the 45th President and might even make his actions seem reasonable.

Back in the UK, the only war on the horizon is a civil one – between those who voted for a break with the European Union and those who wanted to stay. The referendum in 2016, which was supposed to resolve this issue once and for all, did nothing of the sort. It merely created a fundamental schism which splits people along all kinds of lines: age, education, geography, culture and political allegiance.

Theresa May was temporarily buoyed by the news that the UK had reached the second round of the Brexit talks, designed to thrash out a new economic and trading relationship with the EU. But everyone knows this was achieved by big concessions on the so-called divorce settlement and an untidy fudge over the vexed issue of the Irish border.

As my co-presenter on Colourful Radio’s weekly news review show, Michael Ohajuru, so elegantly put it, we’re in danger of running out of long grass.

People talk about clocks ticking, but this particular timepiece is attached to a detonator. And what many don’t realise is that it’s set to explode quite a bit earlier than 2019. That’s because any deal not only has to be approved by the British Parliament (thanks to a backbench revolt by Tory rebels), but also the European Parliament and possibly the Parliaments of the various member states.

If we reach the summer and negotiations are failing to bear fruit, substantial problems loom.

There are all kinds of potential scenarios, of course.

The DUP might decide they can no longer back the May government if she is unable to provide clarity over the border issues in Ireland, although it would be hard to justify to their supporters the forcing of an election which might usher Jeremy Corbyn into Downing Street.

The pro-EU Tory rebels might extract more concessions, angering still further the bulk of Tory MPs, constituency activists and many Conservative voters who yearn for a clean break from Brussels.

The hard Brexiters – who are well represented in the Cabinet – might seek to engineer a crisis in which they claim that continuing the negotiations is a waste of time.

So, in theory, Jeremy Corbyn’s belief that there might be another general election in 2018 isn’t complete fantasy. But the veteran left-winger should beware of what he wishes for.

If the government did fall or May felt obliged to call another election, this campaign actually would be the Brexit election that she wrongly imagined 2017 might have become. It would be a vote triggered by a Brexit crisis and the focus would be on the ways in which we rescue ourselves from the quagmire.

The pressure from many Labour MPs and activists would be for Corbyn to go into a 2018 election vowing to reverse Brexit or, at the very least, put the deal to another referendum. But this goes against all the instincts of the current Labour leadership, which came of age in an era of kneejerk anti-Europeanism on the left. John McDonnell sees the single market as a major obstacle to the implementation of his socialist economic policies and would, I’m sure, prefer that he was free of the shackles of EU regulations.

Let’s say that Corbyn acquiesced to pressure from the Labour grassroots and became more overtly hostile to Brexit. Is this a position from which he can win a general election? 

Many Labour MPs represent seats that voted to leave Europe and it’s hard to imagine that all the heartland voters who came out to back Corbyn in 2017 would do so again. So perhaps we could see Labour doing even better in cities such as London, but losing working-class seats to the Tories in the north of England?

It’s not even beyond the realms of possibility that we could hold another election in 2018 and end up with a result ever bit as inconclusive as the one produced a year earlier. At which point, the long grass will most certainly have dried up.

Listen to Phil Woodford and Michael Ohajuru discuss Trump, Brexit and 2018 on Five in the Eye – Colourful Radio’s weekly news review show. https://archive.org/details/5itE0132

Comments

  1. Thanks for clearing the muddy water a little Phil.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

After more than 30 years, I leave Labour at 11.46am tomorrow.

Barring some kind of minor miracle - on a par perhaps with CETI announcing first contact with the Vulcans or the Great British Bake Off returning to the BBC – Jeremy Corbyn will be re-elected on Saturday as Leader of the Labour Party. The announcement is due at around 11.45 am. So after three decades or so of membership, my association with the party will end at 11.46. Yes, that’s all folks.  I’m afraid I really do mean it this time.  Party card in the shredder.  Standing order cancelled.  It’s goodnight from me. And it’s goodnight Vienna from Labour.  I threatened to quit when the Jezster was first elected, but people persuaded me to stay on in the hope that the situation could be rescued.  I wanted to go when Angela Eagle was unceremoniously dumped in favour of Owen Smith, but was told I couldn’t desert at such a critical moment and should rally behind the PLP’s chosen challenger. Stay and fight, my friends say.  But over what?  The burnt-out shell o

Time for Red Ken to head into the sunset

Voice for 2012: Oona best represents modern Londoners Pin there, done that: Livingstone's campaign is a throwback to the 1980s Ken Livingstone may have lost his grip on power, but he hasn’t lost his chutzpah. The former London mayor was full of chirpy bluster a week ago in Southall, west London, when I popped over to listen to him debate with his rival for the current Labour nomination, Oona King. The contrast between two candidates couldn’t be more striking. Oona is chic, whereas Ken is pure cheek. She talks passionately about the threat posed by gang warfare which currently divides kids in her East London neighbourhood, while he waxes nostalgically about his working-class childhood in post-war council housing. It’s clear that Livingstone has been cryogenically preserved and then defrosted. The only question is when exactly the wily old geezer was put in the freezer. The mid-1980s would be a fair bet, which is when I remember him on a stage in Jubilee Gardens on the south bank

The friends, the facilitators and the failures. They now owe us all an apology.

I keep hearing Corbyn’s tenure referred to as an experiment. But how many experiments continue for four years, despite a toxic chemical haze billowing out of the mad inventor’s lab? The hard-left project should have been stopped in its tracks countless times.  As far back as 2015, Joe Haines – Harold Wilson’s Press Secretary – suggested that the Parliamentary Labour Party should make a unilateral declaration of independence. They could have appointed their own leader in Parliament and bypassed the socialist relic the members had chosen to elect. Instead, they prevaricated. They agonised. They muttered to each other in corridor recesses at Westminster. The frightened bunnies were at first bemused and disoriented, allowing Corbyn and his cabal to consolidate their position. And subsequently, they were frightened. Mainly frightened of the swollen membership of three-quid flotsam and jetsam who had invaded their constituencies pledging allegiance to the sage of the allotments