Skip to main content

It's crunch time once again for the PLP. What do they have to lose?


The last few years in the British Labour Party have been full of terrible misjudgements and mistimings.

Those last-minute charity nominations for Corbyn in the summer of 2015.

The sullen acquiescence of the PLP after Jez was first elected leader, providing him with breathing space to consolidate his position.

The coup that kept on being deferred in 2016. It would be in the new year. It would be after the council elections. It would have to wait until after the EU referendum.

The eventual launch of Angela Eagle’s bid to replace Corbyn. The sidelining of Eagle in favour of Owen Smith, who then ran a campaign in which he claimed to share the left-wing politics of the man he aimed to replace. The offer to Jez of a position as spiritual leader.

The sullen acquiescence of the PLP after Jez’s second win in September 2016.

The cloak of respectability given to Corbyn by people who should know far better. Tom Watson. Emily Thornberry. Keir Starmer.

The complete collapse of resistance after Corbyn achieved a better result in the 2017 election than anyone had ever imagined.


But enough of the past. The PLP now has a chance to redeem itself.

A perfect storm has built up around Corbyn again in recent weeks.

No one should really be that surprised about the pressure points involved: defence and national security; the leadership’s facilitation of a hard Brexit; and the ongoing nightmare of anti-semitism within the party.

Many MPs were outraged at the Labour Leader’s response to the Skripal attack. Rather than rally behind the Prime Minister in a time of crisis, he tried to score petty political points and even laughably suggested that Moscow might like to review samples of the nerve agent involved to confirm whether it was theirs.

Most members of the PLP realise that Corbyn is not up to the job of defending the UK’s national interests.

The sacking of Owen Smith suggests that Jez is living in a Trumpian bubble, where he believes he can remove dissenters with impunity. Whatever we think of the idea of a second referendum, it was countenanced at the Labour Party conference in 2016 and is part of a debate that is raging in the world outside.

Most members of the PLP know that Corbyn is instinctively opposed to the EU and wants to stay outside the single market. They realise that this is one issue where they better represent the views of the wider Labour membership than the Leader.

And now the writing is on the wall over Corbyn’s commentary on an image of an anti-semitic mural. Tom Watson claims the veteran socialist was ‘on the move’ and hadn’t looked at the picture properly when he queried its removal. But why was Corbyn even spending time in Facebook groups with such menacing imagery?

Most members of the PLP understand that although Corbyn himself is not an anti-semite, he has zero credibility on the issue and has failed to act decisively as racist tropes and memes circulate among his fanbase.

Some lawmakers have demanded that Corbyn answer questions on these issues at a meeting on Monday night. The message from his minders, however, is that he doesn’t intend to show up.

Once again, we reach a crossroads. Will we see open revolt in the PLP? Possibly even a declaration of independence in Parliament from the hard-left leadership and its Momentum backers?

Now is the time for action. The MPs have absolutely nothing to lose. Aaron Bastani – the head of an alt-left media outlet called Novara, beloved of the Corbynistas – says that ‘several dozen’ of them are targets for de-selection.

So do their careers end in humiliation? Or do they stand up and fight?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

After more than 30 years, I leave Labour at 11.46am tomorrow.

Barring some kind of minor miracle - on a par perhaps with CETI announcing first contact with the Vulcans or the Great British Bake Off returning to the BBC – Jeremy Corbyn will be re-elected on Saturday as Leader of the Labour Party. The announcement is due at around 11.45 am. So after three decades or so of membership, my association with the party will end at 11.46. Yes, that’s all folks.  I’m afraid I really do mean it this time.  Party card in the shredder.  Standing order cancelled.  It’s goodnight from me. And it’s goodnight Vienna from Labour.  I threatened to quit when the Jezster was first elected, but people persuaded me to stay on in the hope that the situation could be rescued.  I wanted to go when Angela Eagle was unceremoniously dumped in favour of Owen Smith, but was told I couldn’t desert at such a critical moment and should rally behind the PLP’s chosen challenger. Stay and fight, my friends say.  But over what?  The burnt-out shell o

Time for Red Ken to head into the sunset

Voice for 2012: Oona best represents modern Londoners Pin there, done that: Livingstone's campaign is a throwback to the 1980s Ken Livingstone may have lost his grip on power, but he hasn’t lost his chutzpah. The former London mayor was full of chirpy bluster a week ago in Southall, west London, when I popped over to listen to him debate with his rival for the current Labour nomination, Oona King. The contrast between two candidates couldn’t be more striking. Oona is chic, whereas Ken is pure cheek. She talks passionately about the threat posed by gang warfare which currently divides kids in her East London neighbourhood, while he waxes nostalgically about his working-class childhood in post-war council housing. It’s clear that Livingstone has been cryogenically preserved and then defrosted. The only question is when exactly the wily old geezer was put in the freezer. The mid-1980s would be a fair bet, which is when I remember him on a stage in Jubilee Gardens on the south bank

The friends, the facilitators and the failures. They now owe us all an apology.

I keep hearing Corbyn’s tenure referred to as an experiment. But how many experiments continue for four years, despite a toxic chemical haze billowing out of the mad inventor’s lab? The hard-left project should have been stopped in its tracks countless times.  As far back as 2015, Joe Haines – Harold Wilson’s Press Secretary – suggested that the Parliamentary Labour Party should make a unilateral declaration of independence. They could have appointed their own leader in Parliament and bypassed the socialist relic the members had chosen to elect. Instead, they prevaricated. They agonised. They muttered to each other in corridor recesses at Westminster. The frightened bunnies were at first bemused and disoriented, allowing Corbyn and his cabal to consolidate their position. And subsequently, they were frightened. Mainly frightened of the swollen membership of three-quid flotsam and jetsam who had invaded their constituencies pledging allegiance to the sage of the allotments