Skip to main content

What if the whole Corbyn project is based on a lie?


If there’s one thing that scares the Corbyn movement more than anything else, it’s the emergence of a new centre-ground party.

Supporters know very well that once it arrives, the alleged ‘popularity’ of Labour’s far-left leadership would be badly exposed – in just the same way that Michael Foot’s good poll ratings disintegrated with the emergence of the SDP in the early 1980s.

When people are given a choice, many will opt for moderation.

When they lack choice – a particularly stark problem in the UK’s indefensible first-past-the-post electoral system – they tend to polarise to left and right.

For supporters of today’s Labour leadership, it’s therefore critically important to dismiss the centre ground as something which no one wants any more. As a failed ‘neo-liberal’ project, which has no relevance to 2018.

But consider the facts.

A recent BMG Research poll for The Independent found that millions of voters currently find themselves without a political home.

Many feel that the main parties simply don’t represent their views. They look at the Tory free-market, pro-Brexit agenda and feel alienated. At the same time, Labour appears to have drifted too far in the opposite direction.

The proof is in the killer question from the poll.

“If a new political party which pitched itself as sitting in the ‘centre’ or ‘centre ground’ of British politics formed and ran in the next UK general election, how likely would you be to consider voting for it?”

The answer was that 43% would ‘definitely’ or ‘potentially’ consider it.

This is difficult reading for ideologues on the Tory benches in Parliament, who persist in holding Theresa May to a right-wing agenda. The Conservatives are, after all, vulnerable to the birth of a new centrist movement too.

But it’s the Corbynite left that has the most to fear. That’s because the persistent popularity of centrist politics runs completely counter to their whole narrative. It reveals one of the fundamental tenets of their ideology to be a mirage.

According to the Momentum leftists, centre-ground politicians have failed and run out of ideas.

But is that really true?

Do Chuka Umunna and David Lammy and Yvette Cooper and Jess Phillips really have nothing to say about the big issues facing the UK and wider world? Do Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn offer some more profound insight and analysis than these thoughtful centrists?

Or could it be that nuanced and considered politics has been marginalised in a world where people have been encouraged to embrace trite slogans, binary debates on social media and easy solutions to complex problems?

One thing is certain. There’s not only a moral obligation for mainstream politicians to fill the gaping hole in the British democratic system. There’s a huge political opportunity too for those brave enough to seize the initiative.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

After more than 30 years, I leave Labour at 11.46am tomorrow.

Barring some kind of minor miracle - on a par perhaps with CETI announcing first contact with the Vulcans or the Great British Bake Off returning to the BBC – Jeremy Corbyn will be re-elected on Saturday as Leader of the Labour Party. The announcement is due at around 11.45 am. So after three decades or so of membership, my association with the party will end at 11.46. Yes, that’s all folks.  I’m afraid I really do mean it this time.  Party card in the shredder.  Standing order cancelled.  It’s goodnight from me. And it’s goodnight Vienna from Labour.  I threatened to quit when the Jezster was first elected, but people persuaded me to stay on in the hope that the situation could be rescued.  I wanted to go when Angela Eagle was unceremoniously dumped in favour of Owen Smith, but was told I couldn’t desert at such a critical moment and should rally behind the PLP’s chosen challenger. Stay and fight, my friends say.  But over what?  The burnt-out shell o

Time for Red Ken to head into the sunset

Voice for 2012: Oona best represents modern Londoners Pin there, done that: Livingstone's campaign is a throwback to the 1980s Ken Livingstone may have lost his grip on power, but he hasn’t lost his chutzpah. The former London mayor was full of chirpy bluster a week ago in Southall, west London, when I popped over to listen to him debate with his rival for the current Labour nomination, Oona King. The contrast between two candidates couldn’t be more striking. Oona is chic, whereas Ken is pure cheek. She talks passionately about the threat posed by gang warfare which currently divides kids in her East London neighbourhood, while he waxes nostalgically about his working-class childhood in post-war council housing. It’s clear that Livingstone has been cryogenically preserved and then defrosted. The only question is when exactly the wily old geezer was put in the freezer. The mid-1980s would be a fair bet, which is when I remember him on a stage in Jubilee Gardens on the south bank

The friends, the facilitators and the failures. They now owe us all an apology.

I keep hearing Corbyn’s tenure referred to as an experiment. But how many experiments continue for four years, despite a toxic chemical haze billowing out of the mad inventor’s lab? The hard-left project should have been stopped in its tracks countless times.  As far back as 2015, Joe Haines – Harold Wilson’s Press Secretary – suggested that the Parliamentary Labour Party should make a unilateral declaration of independence. They could have appointed their own leader in Parliament and bypassed the socialist relic the members had chosen to elect. Instead, they prevaricated. They agonised. They muttered to each other in corridor recesses at Westminster. The frightened bunnies were at first bemused and disoriented, allowing Corbyn and his cabal to consolidate their position. And subsequently, they were frightened. Mainly frightened of the swollen membership of three-quid flotsam and jetsam who had invaded their constituencies pledging allegiance to the sage of the allotments