Skip to main content

Who needs Chuka when you have Degsy?

In a moment of immense unscripted irony, it was announced today that Derek Hatton - Deputy Leader of Liverpool City Council during the Trotskyist insurgency of the 1980s - has rejoined the Labour Party. As seven brave moderates stick their heads above the parapet and quit to form The Independent Group in Parliament, Corbyn reaches out to his old pals on the hard left.

For those with long memories, 'Degsy' was associated with the very worst of the excesses in local government 35 years ago and was expelled by Neil Kinnock for his part in the organised infiltration of Labour by the Militant Tendency.

Of course, in the world of the current Labour leadership, he's just a comrade who was hounded out in a 'witch-hunt'. Corbyn was one of the leading lights in the campaign to oppose the expulsions in the first place.

Hatton's reinstatement proves the claim of the so-called 'Magnificent Seven' - led by Chuka Umunna and Luciana Berger -  that the Labour Party is no longer the party they originally joined. It is now a movement led by fools. Anti-European relics, who have always secretly welcomed Brexit. Anti-Israeli zealots, who have allowed a sickening tide of anti-semitism to take hold.

It was interesting that Chuka Umunna and Chris Leslie also highlighted Corbyn's dangerous foreign policy as a reason for the split. His opposition to NATO and seeming willingness to peddle whatever pronouncements come out of Moscow make him completely unsuitable as a potential Prime Minister.

I anticipate that the Independent Group will act as a magnet for other Labour MPs. There was apparently applause for the renegades in tonight's Parliamentary Labour Party meeting, which will have caused a great deal of concern to Corbyn and McDonnell.

Deputy Leader Tom Watson said publicly that others may follow Berger, Umunna, Gapes et al unless the leadership changes direction.

But the leadership is incapable of changing direction. 

It pursues only one goal: the installation of a hard-left government committed to nationalisation, a pacifist foreign policy and support for 'socialist' regimes overseas such as Maduro's authoritarian government in Venezuela.

So now, with every crisis provoked by the Labour leadership's incompetence, petty-mindedness or religious fervour, MPs will have a choice. Do they stick around? Or head somewhere the grass is decidedly greener.

Listening to the breakaway MPs, it's clear that what is now a Parliamentary grouping is set to become a fully-fledged party. Of course, the first-past-the-post electoral system is stacked against them. The SDP never made the breakthrough it hoped for in terms of seats in Parliament. But it did achieve something quite profound and remarkable: by getting practically the same level of the popular vote in 1983 as Michael Foot, it forced the Labour Party back towards the mainstream under Kinnock.

The British electorate deserves real choice and, today, we have a sign that it might just be on the horizon. While the Independent Group looks to a different political future, Labour reaches nearly four decades back into the worst of its past.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

After more than 30 years, I leave Labour at 11.46am tomorrow.

Barring some kind of minor miracle - on a par perhaps with CETI announcing first contact with the Vulcans or the Great British Bake Off returning to the BBC – Jeremy Corbyn will be re-elected on Saturday as Leader of the Labour Party. The announcement is due at around 11.45 am. So after three decades or so of membership, my association with the party will end at 11.46. Yes, that’s all folks.  I’m afraid I really do mean it this time.  Party card in the shredder.  Standing order cancelled.  It’s goodnight from me. And it’s goodnight Vienna from Labour.  I threatened to quit when the Jezster was first elected, but people persuaded me to stay on in the hope that the situation could be rescued.  I wanted to go when Angela Eagle was unceremoniously dumped in favour of Owen Smith, but was told I couldn’t desert at such a critical moment and should rally behind the PLP’s chosen challenger. Stay and fight, my friends say.  But over what?  The burnt-out shell o

Time for Red Ken to head into the sunset

Voice for 2012: Oona best represents modern Londoners Pin there, done that: Livingstone's campaign is a throwback to the 1980s Ken Livingstone may have lost his grip on power, but he hasn’t lost his chutzpah. The former London mayor was full of chirpy bluster a week ago in Southall, west London, when I popped over to listen to him debate with his rival for the current Labour nomination, Oona King. The contrast between two candidates couldn’t be more striking. Oona is chic, whereas Ken is pure cheek. She talks passionately about the threat posed by gang warfare which currently divides kids in her East London neighbourhood, while he waxes nostalgically about his working-class childhood in post-war council housing. It’s clear that Livingstone has been cryogenically preserved and then defrosted. The only question is when exactly the wily old geezer was put in the freezer. The mid-1980s would be a fair bet, which is when I remember him on a stage in Jubilee Gardens on the south bank

The friends, the facilitators and the failures. They now owe us all an apology.

I keep hearing Corbyn’s tenure referred to as an experiment. But how many experiments continue for four years, despite a toxic chemical haze billowing out of the mad inventor’s lab? The hard-left project should have been stopped in its tracks countless times.  As far back as 2015, Joe Haines – Harold Wilson’s Press Secretary – suggested that the Parliamentary Labour Party should make a unilateral declaration of independence. They could have appointed their own leader in Parliament and bypassed the socialist relic the members had chosen to elect. Instead, they prevaricated. They agonised. They muttered to each other in corridor recesses at Westminster. The frightened bunnies were at first bemused and disoriented, allowing Corbyn and his cabal to consolidate their position. And subsequently, they were frightened. Mainly frightened of the swollen membership of three-quid flotsam and jetsam who had invaded their constituencies pledging allegiance to the sage of the allotments